<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>K-Squared Ramblings &#187; XML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/tag/xml/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal</link>
	<description>Sci-fi, comics, humor, photos...it&#039;s all fair game.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More Netscape 8 Nuttiness</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/05/more-netscape-8-nuttiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/05/more-netscape-8-nuttiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 23:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2005/05/25/more-netscape-8-nuttiness/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q: What happens when you break up/fire your web browser-developing group with years of experience, and later hire an outside firm to build your next product? A: Netscape 8. IEBlog has an amazing report&#8212;which I&#8217;ve just verified. Netscape 8.0.1 disables &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/05/more-netscape-8-nuttiness/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><abbr title="Question">Q</abbr>:</b> What happens when you break up/fire your web browser-developing group with years of experience, and later hire an outside firm to build your next product?</p>
<p><b><abbr title="Answer">A</abbr>:</b> <strong>Netscape 8.</strong></p>
<p>IEBlog has an amazing report&#8212;which I&#8217;ve just verified.  <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2005/05/25/421763.aspx">Netscape 8.0.1 disables IE&#8217;s XML rendering</a>.  So if you try to load an XML document&#8212;say, an XSLT-styled RSS feed like the feed for this blog&#8212;using Internet Explorer or Netscape 8 with IE&#8217;s engine, you&#8217;ll see either a blank page or an unloaded-image icon.</p>
<p>Apparently every time Netscape 8 runs, it trashes a registry entry that defines how IE displays XML.  At this point the only way to fix it is to uninstall Netscape 8 and delete that entry (directions at the above link).</p>
<p>This raises two questions:</p>
<ol>
<li>Why does Netscape 8 alter an Internet Explorer registry setting?</li>
<li>Why <em>can</em> Netscape 8 alter an Internet Explorer registry setting?</li>
</ol>
<p>I&#8217;ve said it before (though possibly not here), but Mozilla is much better off now that AOL isn&#8217;t calling the shots.</p>
<p><b>Update June 20:</b> Netscape 8.0.2 fixes this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/05/more-netscape-8-nuttiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>XFN Updated</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/08/xfn-updated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/08/xfn-updated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2004 03:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xfn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2004/08/16/xfn-updated/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new version of XFN has been released, with a few changes and a few new attributes. (XFN, the &#8220;XHTML Friends Network&#8221; is a simple way of adding information to a link to indicate your relationship to that person.) New &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/08/xfn-updated/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new version of <a href="http://gmpg.org/xfn/">XFN</a> has been <a href="http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2004/08/16/xfn-11-released/">released</a>, with a few changes and a few new attributes.  (XFN, the &#8220;XHTML Friends Network&#8221; is a simple way of adding information to a link to indicate your relationship to that person.)</p>
<p>New relationship types include <i>kin</i> and <i>contact</i>, expanding the family and friendship dimensions, and <i>me</i>.  The primary reason to add <i>me</i> seems to involve linking together profiles at multiple social networking sites &#8211; Friendster, Orkut, etc., but it brings up an interesting question:</p>
<p>How do you handle a site run by more than one person?  We&#8217;ve had XFN info on this page since sometime last year, and it&#8217;s worked, because we share mostly the same circle of friends.  But we also have links to our individual websites.  Should these both be marked &#8220;me?&#8221;  Presumably not, since the separate sites wouldn&#8217;t represent the same person.  Perhaps something to consider for XFN 1.2?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/08/xfn-updated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

