<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>K-Squared Ramblings &#187; version</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/tag/version/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal</link>
	<description>Sci-fi, comics, humor, photos...it&#039;s all fair game.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What comes after X?</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/12/after-x/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/12/after-x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 07:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[version]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/12/02/after-x/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few years ago, it seemed like everyone was using X in their software versions. Mac&#160;OS&#160;X. Windows&#160;XP with DirectX and ActiveX*. Flash&#160;MX, ColdFusion&#160;MX, and anything else by Macromedia&#160;MX. Macromedia managed to confuse things by releasing two rounds of MX versions, &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/12/after-x/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years ago, it seemed like everyone was using <strong>X</strong> in their software versions.  Mac&nbsp;OS&nbsp;X.  Windows&nbsp;XP with DirectX and ActiveX*.  Flash&nbsp;MX, ColdFusion&nbsp;MX, and anything else by Macromedia&nbsp;MX.  Macromedia managed to confuse things by releasing <em>two</em> rounds of MX versions, such as Flash&nbsp;MX, Flash&nbsp;MX&nbsp;2004 (essentially versions 6 and 7).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s fallen a bit out of favor.  Among those still unwilling to use <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/07/version-numbers/">plain version numbers</a>, vintages are still popular.  Office 2007, Norton Security Suite 2006, etc.  Even though Apple still uses the <strong>X</strong> to promote its operating system, the last two have put a lot of emphasis on the cat-themed code names: Panther, Tiger, Leopard.  And then there&#8217;s Windows Vista.</p>
<p>What do you think the next naming fad will be?</p>
<p><small>*ActiveX was actually a cross between two naming fads.  For a while, everything Microsoft did seemed to be Active&#8212;Active Desktop, Active Directory, etc.)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/12/after-x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

