<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>K-Squared Ramblings &#187; redhat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/tag/redhat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal</link>
	<description>Sci-fi, comics, humor, photos...it&#039;s all fair game.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fedora 7 problems with glint video driver</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/06/fedora-7-problems-with-glint-video-driver/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/06/fedora-7-problems-with-glint-video-driver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 06:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redhat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2007/06/06/fedora-7-problems-with-glint-video-driver/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a warning for any Fedora Linux users preparing to upgrade to Fedora&#160;7: Grab the Live CD first and make sure that all your hardware works properly. If not, see if the fix is available before you actually upgrade. I &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/06/fedora-7-problems-with-glint-video-driver/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a warning for any <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/">Fedora</a> Linux users preparing to upgrade to Fedora&nbsp;7: Grab the Live CD first and make sure that all your hardware works properly.  If not, see if the fix is available before you actually upgrade.</p>
<p>I upgraded a system with a Permedia 2 video card, which uses the glint drivers.  The installer couldn&#8217;t launch the GUI, but I&#8217;ve run into that fairly often, so I just used the text-based installer without thinking much of it.  The upgrade process itself went fine, but on booting into the new system, it was unable to launch X.  I kept getting the following error: <span id="more-1758"></span></p>
<p><code>X: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//glint_drv.so: undefined<br />
symbol: RamDacCreateInfoRec</code></p>
<p>I found a reference to the problem occurring in Debian, as <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2007/05/msg00526.html">Debian bug #423129</a>, then followed that to <a href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10906">Freedesktop.org bug 10906</a>, which has been fixed.  It turns out that the xorg X server moved some features from a pluggable module into the server itself, but didn&#8217;t keep them available for drivers that use them.  I tested the patch with the X server <abbr title="Source RPM">SRPM</abbr> from Fedora, and was able to run the system in graphics mode again.</p>
<p>Then I checked Fedora&#8217;s bug database, and found <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242800">Red Hat bug 242800</a>, filed just yesterday.   I confirmed that I had the same problem, pointed them at the upstream bug, and reported that the fix worked for me.</p>
<p>For those who are comfortable with modifying and building SRPMs, you can grab xorg-x11-server-1.3.0.0-5.fc7.src.rpm from any <a href="http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/Fedora/7/">Fedora mirror</a>, then add the patch from that Freedesktop.org bug report to the SPEC file.  That will give you a set of RPMs that will work with the card.  (If you don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m talking about, you&#8217;re probably better off waiting until Fedora has a chance to test the fix and issue an update, but if you want to learn, check out the <a href="http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts/rpm-guide-en/">RPM Guide</a>, particularly chapters 8 and 9.)</p>
<p><b>Update (June 7):</b> A fixed version, xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.3.0.0-8.fc7 has hit the testing repository.</p>
<p><b>Update (June 11):</b> The fix has been released, so all you have to do is install/upgrade in text mode and run <code>yum update</code> after you&#8217;re done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/06/fedora-7-problems-with-glint-video-driver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mozilla + Linux</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/12/mozilla-linux/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/12/mozilla-linux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redhat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SuSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/12/11/mozilla-linux/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is good news: Mozilla will be working more closely with various Linux distributors including Red Hat, Novell, Ubuntu, and yes, even Debian, to coordinate Firefox updates, configuration, etc. There are two main issues: making Mozilla&#8217;s Firefox installer work everywhere &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/12/mozilla-linux/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good news: Mozilla will be <a href="http://christopher.aillon.org/blog/dev/mozilla/20061204-linux-alliance.html" title="Mozilla Corp. to work more closely with Linux distributors">working more closely</a> with various Linux distributors including Red Hat, Novell, Ubuntu, and yes, even Debian, to coordinate Firefox updates, configuration, etc.</p>
<p>There are two main issues: making Mozilla&#8217;s Firefox installer work everywhere (it mostly does, but on some systems you need to <a href="http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=478605">install some compatibility libraries</a> first), and keeping the distributions&#8217; versions in sync with the official one.</p>
<p>After the <a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/118268/">Debian IceWeasel debacle</a>, and Fedora deciding to <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox2">skip Firefox&nbsp;2</a> and wait for Firefox&nbsp;3, it&#8217;s good to know that Mozilla has recognized the problem and is working on it.  One key piece of information: Red Hat and Novell will both be providing extended support for Firefox&nbsp;1.5 past its official <abbr title="end of life">EOL</abbr> next April.</p>
<p><small>(<a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2006-December/msg00002.html">via Fedora Weekly News</a>)</small> <!-- orig. http://fedoranews.org/wiki/Fedora_Weekly_News_Issue_70 --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/12/mozilla-linux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fedora Rising</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/03/fedora-rising/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/03/fedora-rising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redhat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2005/03/14/fedora-rising/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Netcraft&#8217;s ongoing web server survey has found Fedora Core usage growing 122% over the past 6 months, nearly three times the growth rate of any other Linux distribution they surveyed. (Gentoo was second with 45% growth). In absolute numbers, Red &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/03/fedora-rising/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2005/03/14/fedora_makes_rapid_progress.html"><img src="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/wp-content/uploads/2005/03/fedorarising.png" alt="Graph (original at Netcraft)" align="right" /></a>Netcraft&#8217;s ongoing web server survey has found <a href="http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2005/03/14/fedora_makes_rapid_progress.html"><strong>Fedora Core usage growing 122%</strong></a> over the past 6 months, nearly three times the growth rate of any other Linux distribution they surveyed.  (<a href="http://www.gentoo.org/">Gentoo</a> was second with 45% growth).  In absolute numbers, <a href="http://www.redhat.com/">Red Hat</a> remains #1 with <a href="http://www.debian.org/">Debian</a> as #2.  Red Hat itself is dropping slowly, having lost 1.2%.  I would assume that those are switching to a mix of <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/">Fedora Core</a>, Debian, <a href="http://www.novell.com/linux/">SuSE</a> and <abbr title="Red Hat Enterprise Linux">RHEL</abbr> clones like <a href="http://www.centos.org/">CentOS</a> or <a href="http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/">White Box Linux</a>.  There&#8217;s a nice graph in the article that shows the trend more clearly.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s just web servers.</p>
<p>Tell me again how everyone&#8217;s abandoning Fedora Core in the wake of the Red Hat/Fedora split?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/03/fedora-rising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Turnover</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/07/quick-turnover/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/07/quick-turnover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redhat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2004/07/14/quick-turnover/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got a notice of a security fix for the version of Ethereal included in Fedora Core 1, and it suddenly hit me: I don&#8217;t have any computers running Fedora 1 anymore! I&#8217;ve moved all my desktops up to &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/07/quick-turnover/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got a notice of a security fix for the version of Ethereal included in <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/">Fedora Core</a> 1, and it suddenly hit me:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any computers running Fedora 1 anymore!  I&#8217;ve moved all my desktops up to Fedora Core 2, and all the Linux servers I manage are still running <a href="http://www.redhat.com/">Red Hat</a> 7.3 or 9 with unofficial updates.</p>
<p>No wonder the fast release plan didn&#8217;t bug me much! </p>
<p>(As I wrote this, the notice for the Fedora 2 update came across, but seeing just the one did give me a bit of a start when I realized it didn&#8217;t apply.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/07/quick-turnover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

