<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>K-Squared Ramblings &#187; pseudoscience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/tag/pseudoscience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal</link>
	<description>Sci-fi, comics, humor, photos...it&#039;s all fair game.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:49:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='www.hyperborea.org' port='80' path='/journal/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Sci-Tech Links</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2008/04/17/sci-tech-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2008/04/17/sci-tech-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AvenueQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert J Sawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/?p=2439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists have built a computer model of the Neanderthal vocal tract based on fossils, and have simulated the kinds of sounds they could have produced.  Ever since I read Robert J. Sawyer&#8217;s Neanderthal Parallax novels, I&#8217;ve been fascinated by the idea that there were two distinct human species, living side by side, for perhaps [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientists have built a computer model of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal">Neanderthal</a> vocal tract based on fossils, and have <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/channel/being-human/dn13672" title="New Scientist: Neanderthals speak out after 30,000 years">simulated the kinds of sounds</a> they could have produced.  Ever since I read Robert J. Sawyer&#8217;s <a href="http://www.sfwriter.com/exho.htm"><i>Neanderthal Parallax</i></a> novels, I&#8217;ve been fascinated by the idea that there were two distinct human species, living side by side, for perhaps thousands of years.  What happened to them?  Did our ancestors kill them off, or interbreed with them?  Did they fail to adapt to a changing climate?  <small>(<a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?no_d2=1&#038;sid=08/04/16/2149245">via Slashdot</a>)</small></p>
<p>On a related note, it seems that <a href="http://www.expelledexposed.com/"><i>Expelled</i></a>, the anti-science propaganda film that actually invokes <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law">Godwin&#8217;s Law</a> by claiming that &#8220;believing&#8221; evolution <a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2008/03/21/creationism-evolution-and-nazis-yes-nazis/">leads to Nazis</a>, opens this weekend.  I&#8217;m curious to see how badly they misrepresent things (it&#8217;s always best to look for yourself, instead of just taking other people at their word&#8212;that&#8217;s the whole idea behind science, after all), but I can&#8217;t bring myself to support them by actually giving them money.  Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.expelledexposed.com/">Expelled Exposed</a> is interesting reading.</p>
<p>Somewhat(!) less controversial, InformationWeek reports that <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/windows/operatingsystems/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207200856">Windows XP <abbr title="Service Pack 3">SP3</abbr> may be out as soon as next week</a>.  This reminds me: I really should look up some reviews of Vista <abbr title="Service Pack 1">SP1</abbr> and see if it&#8217;s improved matters any.</p>
<p>Still in software, dria.org explains why the <a href="http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2008/04/17/628/">AwesomeBar is awesome</a>.  That&#8217;s the nickname given to the new address bar in Firefox 3, which lets you search your browser history as you type.  It&#8217;s the reason I never went back to Firefox 2 after trying out one of the later FX3 betas, and why I&#8217;ve installed Fx3b5 on two more machines.  The Opera 9.5 previews have a similar feature, but Firefox&#8217;s implementation is better visually.  It&#8217;s easier to spot the page you want, and over time, it learns which pages you visit more often.  It&#8217;s so much faster to type a word or two than to hunt through the bookmarks menu. <small>(<a href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archives/2008/04/firefox_three_i.html">via Asa Dotzler</a>)</small></p>
<p>[Edit] I forgot to include IEEE&#8217;s article on how copyright law applies to websites, <a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/what-can-you-legally-take-from-the-web">What Can You (Legally) Take From the Web?</a></p>
<p>Finally, ***Dave relates an <a href="http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/2008/04/17/nyc_avenue_q.html">incredibly cool story</a> of going to see <a href="http://www.avenueq.com/"><i>Avenue&nbsp;Q</i></a> and what happened after the show.  I had no idea that (at least in New York), the &#8220;Give Me Your Money&#8221; segment was <em>actually collecting for a charity</em>.</p>
<hr /><small>Copyright &copy; 2009 Kelson Vibber and/or Katherine Foreman.<br /> This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only. <br /> The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. Permission granted to Planet Antispam and LiveJournal syndication feed ksquaredramblin.  If this content is not in your news reader or one of the sites listed above, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. (Digital Fingerprint: bc1c453a98ff79bab5c4fca2d890469d (38.107.191.92) )</small> <a href="http://www.hudson-family.co.uk/extremecorticate.php?source=673"></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2008/04/17/sci-tech-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad Science.  Good Sci-Fi.</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/04/17/bad-science-good-sci-fi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/04/17/bad-science-good-sci-fi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi/Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/04/17/bad-science-good-sci-fi/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are certain ideas that I find completely acceptable in the context of science-fiction, but completely looney in the context of actual science.
Take, for instance, Erich von Däniken&#8217;s premise that gods were really ancient alien astronauts.  It&#8217;s an interesting idea, but it&#8217;s way out there in terms of science.  It assumes that (a) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are certain ideas that I find completely acceptable in the context of science-fiction, but completely looney in the context of actual science.</p>
<p>Take, for instance, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_von_D%C3%A4niken">Erich von Däniken&#8217;s</a> premise that gods were really ancient alien astronauts.  It&#8217;s an interesting idea, but it&#8217;s way out there in terms of science.  It assumes that (a) myths are historically accurate, (b) aliens exist, and (c) low-tech humans couldn&#8217;t possibly have created things like Stonehenge, pyramids, giant stone heads, etc.  Not to say it&#8217;s not <em>possible</em> that aliens visited the planet in the distant past&#8212;just that comparative mythology and architecture aren&#8217;t exactly compelling evidence.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I have no problem with the concept in science-fiction.  It&#8217;s the basic premise of <i>Stargate</i>.  The movie and early seasons of <i>SG-1</i> focused on Egyptian mythology and technology, and in subsequent seasons of the show, just about every ancient legend has turned out to have an alien race behind it.  It also figures into the backstory of <i>Babylon 5</i>, with the Vorlons having visited nearly every known race in ancient times, insinuating themselves into local religions and engineering telepaths over the course of centuries.</p>
<p>(via <a href="http://sclerotic-rings.livejournal.com/1387756.html">Sclerotic Rings</a> and <a href="http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/2006/04/10/score_one_for_t.html">*** Dave</a>)</p>
<hr /><small>Copyright &copy; 2009 Kelson Vibber and/or Katherine Foreman.<br /> This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only. <br /> The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. Permission granted to Planet Antispam and LiveJournal syndication feed ksquaredramblin.  If this content is not in your news reader or one of the sites listed above, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. (Digital Fingerprint: bc1c453a98ff79bab5c4fca2d890469d (38.107.191.92) )</small> <a href="http://www.hudson-family.co.uk/extremecorticate.php?source=673"></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/04/17/bad-science-good-sci-fi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
