<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>K-Squared Ramblings &#187; OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/tag/os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal</link>
	<description>Sci-fi, comics, humor, photos...it&#039;s all fair game.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fast OS Updates</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/08/fast-os-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/08/fast-os-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 19:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2004/08/26/fast-os-updates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lately there seems to be a lot of concern with how long Microsoft is taking to develop the next version of Windows. Since people clearly want their operating systems updated faster, allow me to provide a list: Red Hat or &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/08/fast-os-updates/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately there seems to be a lot of concern with how long Microsoft is taking to develop the next version of Windows.  Since people clearly want their operating systems updated faster, allow me to provide a list:</p>
<ul>
<li><b><a href="http://www.redhat.com/">Red Hat</a> or <a href="http://www.novell.com/linux/">SuSE</a> Enterprise Linux</b>.  New versions every 12-18 months.  (<a href="http://www.mandriva.com/">Mandrake</a> Corporate Server seems about the same.)</li>
<li><b><a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/">Mac OS</a></b>.  The past few years have seen yearly updates as OS X has settled in, although they plan to slow down now.  Last I looked, they hadn&#8217;t announced a release date for Tiger (OS 10.4).</li>
<li><b><a href="http://www.novell.com/linux/">SuSE Linux</a></b> or <b><a href="http://www.mandriva.com/">Mandrake Linux</a></b>.  I&#8217;m not sure what their timetable is, but they each tend to release at least one new version each year.</li>
<li><b><a href="http://www.openbsd.org/">OpenBSD</a></b>. New version every <a href="http://openbsd.org/faq/faq1.html#Next">6</a> months.</li>
<li><b><a href="http://fedoraproject.org/">Fedora Core Linux</a></b>.  New version roughly every <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development#head-7e7d8b11fd3509e4e0599849a5d5a896d59bf50a">6</a> months.</li>
<li><b><a href="http://www.freebsd.org/">FreeBSD</a></b>. New version roughly every <a href="http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/faq/01.09.shtml">4</a> months.</li>
<li><b><a href="http://www.gentoo.org/">Gentoo Linux</a></b>. <a href="http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/releng/">Quarterly</a> releases.</li>
</ul>
<p>Of course, those who <em>really</em> need their upgrade fix can go for development branches like Fedora Rawhide, Mandrake Cooker, or <a href="http://www.debian.org/">Debian</a> Unstable.  Not that I&#8217;d recommend this for anyone who wasn&#8217;t actually <em>working on</em> the product, but hey, you can upgrade your system every day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/08/fast-os-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

