<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>K-Squared Ramblings &#187; horror</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/tag/horror/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal</link>
	<description>Sci-fi, comics, humor, photos...it&#039;s all fair game.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>On Army of Darkness</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2009/11/on-army-of-darkness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2009/11/on-army-of-darkness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi/Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army of Darkness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2009/11/04/on-army-of-darkness/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekend I finally watched Evil Dead 2. Aside from some nifty low-budget cinematography, it mostly confirmed that the only movie in the trilogy I actually like is Army of Darkness. Not surprising, since I like the sword and sorcery &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2009/11/on-army-of-darkness/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This weekend I finally watched <i>Evil Dead 2</i>. Aside from some nifty low-budget cinematography, it mostly confirmed that the only movie in the trilogy I actually like is <i>Army of Darkness</i>. Not surprising, since I like the sword and sorcery genre better than horror to begin with.</p>
<p>I also started thinking about what sets the Evil Dead trilogy apart from other 1980s horror series: instead of focusing on the villains, the later installments are all about the hero.</p>
<p><i>Friday the 13th</i>? All about Jason. <i>Nightmare on Elm Street</i>? Freddie Kruger. <i>Hellraiser</i>? Pinhead and the Cenobites.</p>
<p><i>Evil Dead</i>? Ash. Hail to the King.</p>
<p>At the comic store today, I noticed that there&#8217;s a whole line of sequel comics, focusing again on Ash (including &#8220;Ash Saves Obama&#8221;). But they&#8217;re not titled <i>Evil Dead</i>. They&#8217;re all <i>Army of Darkness</i>. It must have greater name recognition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2009/11/on-army-of-darkness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evil Dead and Flashforward</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2008/12/ed-ff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2008/12/ed-ff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 07:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi/Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash Forward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Raimi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tweets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2008/12/01/line-items-for-2008-12-01/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally saw Evil Dead this weekend # Started reading Flashforward. Amused that the trigger is an experiment on the Large Hadron Collider. #]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="aktt_tweet_digest">
<li>Finally saw Evil Dead this weekend <a href="http://twitter.com/KelsonV/statuses/1032716713" class="aktt_tweet_time">#</a></li>
<li>Started reading <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0812580346?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=hyperborea-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=0812580346"><i>Flashforward</i></a>. Amused that the trigger is an experiment on the Large Hadron Collider. <a href="http://twitter.com/KelsonV/statuses/1032898628" class="aktt_tweet_time">#</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2008/12/ed-ff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mary Shelley&#8217;s Bride of Frankenstein</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/09/bride-of-frankenstein/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/09/bride-of-frankenstein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi/Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frankenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/09/11/bride-of-frankenstein/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been working my way through the classic Universal Frankenstein movies, some of which I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve seen before, and some of which I&#8217;m sure I haven&#8217;t. Of course, they get filtered through having read the book at least three &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/09/bride-of-frankenstein/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been working my way through the classic Universal <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0021884/"><i>Frankenstein</i></a> movies, some of which I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve seen before, and some of which I&#8217;m sure I haven&#8217;t.  Of course, they get filtered through having read the book at least three times and having watched <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0072431/"><i>Young Frankenstein</i></a> many times.</p>
<p>Last weekend I watched <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0026138/"><i>Bride of Frankenstein</i></a>.  It&#8217;s a good movie, but the framing sequence bugs me.  In it, Lord Byron is telling Mary Shelley how much he enjoyed her tale of horror, and proceeds to revisit the high points in the 1935 version of &#8220;Previously, in <i>Frankenstein</i>&#8230;&#8221;  Unfortunately, just about everything he mentions <em>wasn&#8217;t in her book!</em> (Neither the 1818 or 1831 versions.)  He then bemoans that it should have ended so abruptly, at which point she says something like, &#8220;Ended?  That wasn&#8217;t the end at all!&#8221; and proceeds to tell Percy Shelley and Lord Byron the tale of, well, the next movie.</p>
<p>All this, despite the fact that the movies clearly take place in the 20th century, though they at least went to the effort to dress Byron and the Shelleys in period costumes.</p>
<p>On one hand, it&#8217;s a nifty conceit, made somehow more appropriate by casting the same actress, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0006471/">Elsa Lanchester</a>, as both Mary Shelley and the Bride.</p>
<p>On the other hand, it&#8217;s emblematic of Hollywood&#8217;s mixed demand and contempt for original source material and its authors.  This is the industry that brought us both <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103874/"><i>Bram Stoker&#8217;s Dracula</i></a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109836/"><i>Mary Shelley&#8217;s Frankenstein</i></a>, trading on the author&#8217;s name as a claim of authenticity while still taking things in their own direction.  (To be fair, both movies made efforts to include aspects of the original stories that are usually left out.  And <i>MSF</i> followed quite well until about 5 minutes before the end, at which point it took a 90° turn and flew off into another movie entirely.)</p>
<p>Neil Gaiman says it best in his short story, &#8220;The Goldfish Pool and Other Stories&#8221; (in <a href="http://www.neilgaiman.com/works/books/smokemirrors/"><i>Smoke and Mirrors</i></a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>She managed a pitying look, of the kind that only people who know that books are, at best, properties on which films can be loosely based, can bestow on the rest of us.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/09/bride-of-frankenstein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mnemovore Mnastiness</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/08/mnemovore-nastiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/08/mnemovore-nastiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 06:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi/Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mnemovore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vertigo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/?p=1018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mnemovore #5 came out this week. (For some reason issue #4 shipped twice&#8212;once just before Comic-Con and again last week.) This week&#8217;s issue, or at least my copy, has a strange quirk to it. Some of the word balloons are &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/08/mnemovore-nastiness/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mnemovore">Mnemovore</a> #5</i> <!-- was http://www.dccomics.com/features/mnemovore/ --> came out this week.  (For some reason issue #4 shipped twice&#8212;once just before Comic-Con and again last week.)  This week&#8217;s issue, or at least my copy, has a strange quirk to it.  Some of the word balloons are faded, as if a rubber stamp was pushed down with unequal force, or as if someone ran a gradient tool over the text with Photoshop.  I&#8217;m still not sure whether it&#8217;s intentional or just a coloring or printing error.</p>
<p>This scan should be relatively non-spoilery:</p>
<p><img class="centered" src="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/wp-content/uploads/2005/08/mnemovorefade.png" alt="Panel showing faded word balloon" width="204" height="198" /></p>
<p>At one point I thought they might be the result of coloring gradients applied above the word balloons instead of below, but I could only get a few to match up.</p>
<p>The thing is, it&#8217;s appropriate for the book&#8212;if maddening to try to read.  The premise is that into our information-saturated world has come a predator that feeds on information, eating people&#8217;s memories and leaving them amnesiac or worse.  In a story about information loss, gaps in information make thematic sense.  And there was one panel with the same effect last issue: &#8220;They can make it so you can&#8217;t&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Just one issue to go&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/08/mnemovore-nastiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>V for Visceral</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/07/v-for-visceral/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/07/v-for-visceral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 22:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comic Con 2005]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2005/07/18/v-for-visceral/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late lunch today (there&#8217;s a news flash). Heard the last bit of an interview with Rob Zombie about The Devil&#8217;s Rejects, which was all over Comic-Con. Interesting perspective on the MPAA rating process, where he actually had to contact the &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/07/v-for-visceral/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late lunch today (there&#8217;s a news flash).  Heard the last bit of an <a href="http://www.kcrw.com/etc/programs/tb/tb050718r_ratings_short_film" title="The Business: -R- Ratings, Short Films and Agents">interview with Rob Zombie</a> about <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0395584/"><i>The Devil&#8217;s Rejects</i></a>, which was all over Comic-Con.  Interesting perspective on the MPAA rating process, where he actually had to contact the MPAA directly to negotiate down to an R.  Apparently after going back and forth on cuts with the studio as a mediator, he got to the point where toning down the villains made them seem less evil.  Instead of making a film with violent villains, it was heading toward becoming a violent action film.  After another round of calls directly with the ratings people, he apparently managed to get them to agree with him.</p>
<p>Also interesting: The MPAA will let filmmakers show much more graphic violence with a known celebrity than a B-list, cult, or unknown actor.  With any commercial film, you know intellectually that the actor isn&#8217;t really being killed.  But with someone you recognize, you have the added sense that there is no way that (for example) Brad Pitt&#8217;s skull is really being ripped open.  With an actor you don&#8217;t know, your brain doesn&#8217;t have that extra disconnect layer and (in theory) takes it closer to face value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/07/v-for-visceral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Well, that sucks.</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/02/well-that-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/02/well-that-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2004 20:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buffy/Angel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joss Whedon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Frost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2004/02/15/well-that-sucks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Miss two weeks and they pull the rug out from under you: &#8230;the cast, crew, writers and producers of Angel deserve to be able to wrap up the series in a way befitting a classic television series and that is &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/02/well-that-sucks/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miss two weeks and they <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.thewb.com/PressRelease/Index/0,8341,156980,00.html" title="Press Release: Important News About Angel">pull the rug out from under you</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;the cast, crew, writers and producers of Angel deserve to be able to wrap up the series in a way befitting a classic television series and that is why we went to Joss to let him know that this would be the last year of the series on The WB</p></blockquote>
<p>At least the WB had the decency to let them know in time to do some sort of wrap-up, unlike the way <a href="http://www.watchfarscape.com/" title="Farscape">certain other shows</a> were treated by channels that shall not be named.</p>
<p>Unfortunately we live in a world where the offbeat has to make way for the mainstream.  I don&#8217;t care if the WB puts up some new &#8220;reality&#8221; show, as long as I can find the kind of shows I like to watch.  With so many hundreds of cable and satellite stations available, you&#8217;d think there&#8217;d be room for shows like <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112209/"><i>VR.5</i></a> and <a href="http://www.midwinter.com/lurk/"><i>Crusade</i></a>.</p>
<p>Still, <a href="http://www.cityofangel.com/"><i>Angel</i></a> managed five years, which is pretty damn respectable &#8211; especially in the modern era of cancelling shows <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0303461/" title="Firefly">without even airing</a> <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0312098/" title="Birds of Prey">half a season</a>.</p>
<p>Joss Whedon sums up the perils of producing anything that <a href="http://movies.ign.com/articles/492/492496p1.html" title="FilmForce: Breaking News: Angel to End After 5 Seasons">strays too far from the  beaten path</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Two roads diverged in a wood,<br />
and I took the road less traveled by<br />
and they CANCELLED MY FRIKKIN&#8217; SHOW.<br />
I totally shoulda took the road<br />
that had all those people on it.<br />
Damn.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/02/well-that-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

