<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>K-Squared Ramblings &#187; GPL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/tag/gpl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal</link>
	<description>Sci-fi, comics, humor, photos...it&#039;s all fair game.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GPL Victorious Again</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/04/gpl-victorious-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/04/gpl-victorious-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2005/04/26/gpl-victorious-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The gpl-violations.org project has scored another victory, this time against Fortinet, whom they accused of not only violating the GPL (by using GPL&#8217;ed source code without publicly releasing their changes) but actually trying to hide that usage with encryption. Edit &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/04/gpl-victorious-again/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://gpl-violations.org/">gpl-violations.org</a> project has <a href="http://news.cnet.com/Fortinet-settles-GPL-violation-suit/2100-7344_3-5684880.html" title="CNET: Fortinet settles GPL violation suit">scored another victory</a>, this time against Fortinet, whom they accused of not only violating the <a href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html"><abbr title="General Public License">GPL</abbr></a> (by using GPL&#8217;ed source code without publicly releasing their changes) but actually trying to <em>hide</em> that usage with encryption.</p>
<p><b>Edit</b> (I hit &#8220;publish&#8221; too soon!): They settled out of court, with Fortinet agreeing to make the source code available for their customized Linux kernel and other GPL&#8217;ed software they snurched from other projects, and to include the GPL in their licensing terms.</p>
<blockquote><p>This is the latest in a string of victories for the gpl-violations.org project. Since starting the project in 2004, Welte has negotiated more than 30 out-of-court settlements.</p></blockquote>
<p>But then, &#8220;the GPL has never been tested in court,&#8221; right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/04/gpl-victorious-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Geek Factor</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/10/the-geek-factor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/10/the-geek-factor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sleep]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2004/10/27/the-geek-factor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw this CNET headline &#8212; Microsoft battles piracy with free software &#8212; and my first thought was that they were using some GPL&#8217;ed/BSD&#8217;ed/etc. tool for tracking or some such. No, they&#8217;re just giving away free software to people who &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/10/the-geek-factor/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this CNET headline &#8212; <a href="http://news.cnet.com/Microsoft-battles-piracy-with-free-software/2100-1016_3-5429449.html">Microsoft battles piracy with free software</a> &#8212; and my first thought was that they were using some GPL&#8217;ed/BSD&#8217;ed/etc. tool for tracking or some such. No, they&#8217;re just giving away free software to people who will let them remotely verify that their OS installation is legit.  Which makes perfect sense once you get out of the open-source/Free software (with a capital F) mindset.</p>
<p>In other news, I feel like I&#8217;ve spent the entire month of October rebuilding, recovering, restoring, repairing, reinstalling and retrofitting computers.</p>
<p>Strike that.  I <em>have</em> spent the entire month doing that.  *Sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/10/the-geek-factor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

