<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>K-Squared Ramblings &#187; flock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/tag/flock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal</link>
	<description>Sci-fi, comics, humor, photos...it&#039;s all fair game.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Summer of the Browser</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2008/06/upcoming-browsers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2008/06/upcoming-browsers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkblogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/?p=2495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firefox: The new release candidate Firefox 3 RC2 is out. No date yet on the official launch, but they&#8217;re still saying June. Also, developers are starting to talk work that&#8217;s gone into what will become Firefox 3.1, such as completing &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2008/06/upcoming-browsers/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Firefox:</strong>  The new release candidate <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2008/06/04/second-firefox-3-release-candidate-now-available-for-download/">Firefox 3 RC2 is out</a>.  No date yet on the official launch, but they&#8217;re still saying June.  Also, developers are starting to talk work that&#8217;s gone into what will become Firefox 3.1, such as <a href="http://www.css3.info/firefox-31-is-the-latest-to-pass-our-selectors-test/">completing CSS3 selectors support</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Opera:</strong> A <a href="http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/2008/06/05/looking-sharp">new Opera 9.5 preview</a> came out today, showcasing the browser&#8217;s <a href="http://operawatch.com/news/2008/06/the-emperors-new-clothes.html">new look</a>.  Also, the Opera Core team takes a look at what you can do if you put <a href="http://my.opera.com/core/blog/2008/06/05/engineering-seminar">hardware acceleration on the whole browser</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Internet Explorer:</strong> <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2008/06/03/ie8-beta-2-coming-in-august.aspx">IE8 beta 2 is scheduled for August</a>.  I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing what they&#8217;ve done, and figure I&#8217;ll start updating sites to accommodate changes.  I <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2008/03/ie8-b1/">held off</a> changing too much when IE8b1 came out, because some of the differences were obviously bugs (triggering the <a href="http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=CaioHack">Caio Hack</a>, for instance; and yes, I reported it).</p>
<p><strong>Flock</strong> has been moving ahead with small, rapid releases, adding integration for new services each time.  They just <a href="http://www.flock.com/node/62337">added Digg and Pownce in Flock 1.2</a> a few days ago.  Now they&#8217;re getting ready to start on Flock 2.0, which will merge in all the new capabilities of Firefox 3.  That means it&#8217;ll get new rendering capabilities, better memory management, probably EV certs and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2008/06/upcoming-browsers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flocking from Netscape</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2008/04/netscape-to-flock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2008/04/netscape-to-flock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/?p=2412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When AOL first announced they were discontinuing Netscape, they recommended Firefox (a logical choice for many reasons). Since then, they&#8217;ve also started heavily promoting Flock&#8212;to the point of offering seamless upgrades from NS8 to Flock. (In theory, anyway; I fired &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2008/04/netscape-to-flock/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://archive.netscape.com/"><img border="0" alt="Netscape. " src="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/netscape.png" class="tr alignright" width="60" height="60" /></a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flock_(web_browser)"><img class="alignright" src="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/flock_60.png" alt="Flock. " title="" width="60" height="60"/></a>When AOL first announced they were <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/12/farewell-netscape/">discontinuing Netscape</a>, they recommended <a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&#038;id=880&#038;t=1">Firefox</a> (a logical choice for many reasons).  Since then, they&#8217;ve also started heavily promoting <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flock_(web_browser)">Flock</a>&#8212;to the point of offering <a href="http://blog.netscape.com/2008/03/19/netscape-8-update-forthcoming-you-can-flock-too/" title="Netscape 8 Update Forthcoming: You Can Flock Too!">seamless upgrades from NS8 to Flock</a>.  (<del>In theory, anyway; I fired up the copy I had for testing and couldn&#8217;t get it to do anything but update to the most recent 8.x version.</del> Confirmed.  I let it sit open in the background for a while, and it eventually popped up the offer for 1-click Flock migration.)  Netscape&nbsp;9 has an <a href="http://blog.netscape.com/2008/02/20/netscape-9-users-time-to-flock-or-firefox/" title="Netscape 9 Users: Time to Flock or Firefox">update notice</a> that offers to download Flock or Firefox.</p>
<p>The key issue, of course, is moving as many users as possible from a discontinued browser&#8212;there&#8217;s no doubt that security holes will be found in it over time&#8212;to one that is actively maintained.</p>
<p><strong>Why Flock, specifically?</strong>  Well, sticking with the same toolkit and user profile makes migration easier, so that narrows the field to Firefox and Flock.  (Not sure about SeaMonkey&#8217;s profile.)  Since Netscape&nbsp;8 and 9 were big on integrating with websites, Flock&#8217;s &#8220;social browser&#8221; seems a slightly better fit.  And it turns out most of the Netscape&nbsp;8 team <a href="http://blog.netscape.com/2008/03/19/netscape-8-update-forthcoming-you-can-flock-too/" title="Netscape 8 Update Forthcoming: You Can Flock Too!">went on to build Flock</a>.  Talk about social networking!</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.flock.com/node/61659">via Flock: The Netscape Spirit Lives On</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2008/04/netscape-to-flock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Browser Bits</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/11/browser-bits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/11/browser-bits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NaNoWriMo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2007/11/06/browser-bits/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Flock web browser has just made its 1.0 release. This is the Firefox-based browser that&#8217;s built around integration with social networking sites. Still no sign of a non-beta Safari&#160;3 outside of Leopard. Five years ago, Mozilla was forced to &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/11/browser-bits/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flock_(web_browser)"><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/flock_60.png" alt="Flock. " title="" width="60" height="60"/></a>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flock_(web_browser)">Flock</a> web browser has just <a href="http://www.flock.com/node/59720">made its 1.0 release</a>.  This is the Firefox-based browser that&#8217;s built around integration with social networking sites.</p>
<p>Still no sign of a non-beta <a href="http://www.apple.com/">Safari&nbsp;3</a> outside of Leopard.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&#038;id=880&#038;t=1"><img class="alignright" alt="Firefox." border="0" src="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/firefox_60h.png" width="60" height="60" /></a>Five years ago, Mozilla was <a href="http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=291">forced to rename</a> the Phoenix web browser because Phoenix Technologies was working on an in-BIOS browser that would let you get on the internet and troubleshoot/download drivers/etc. even if your operating system was trashed.  It became Firebird, and then <a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&#038;id=880&#038;t=1">Firefox</a>.  The Phoenix product has finally <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2704,2211507,00.asp">been released</a>.  <a href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archives/2007/11/irony.html">Ironically</a>, it&#8217;s evolved into an embedded Linux distro that runs&#8230; Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/11/browser-bits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spreading to the Converted</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/04/flockstars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/04/flockstars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 05:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2007/04/19/flockstars/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the problems with the ubiquitous Get Firefox! Get Opera! etc. web buttons is that while they might encourage someone unfamiliar with the product to check it out, they&#8217;re kind of pointless to someone who already uses your preferred &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/04/flockstars/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flock_(web_browser)"><img class="alignright" src="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/flock_60.png" alt="Flock. " title="" width="60" height="60"/></a>One of the problems with the ubiquitous <a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&#038;id=880&#038;t=1">Get Firefox!</a>  <a href="http://my.opera.com/community/download.pl?ref=Kelson&#038;p=opera_desktop">Get Opera!</a> etc. web buttons is that while they might encourage someone unfamiliar with the product to check it out, they&#8217;re kind of pointless to someone who already uses your preferred browser.  Sure, there&#8217;s a sense of, &#8220;Hey, this author uses Opera too!&#8221; but that&#8217;s about all it can do.</p>
<p>To make these a little more useful, on my Flash site, I use JavaScript to <a href="http://archive-sfx.spreadfirefox.com/node/21365" title="Conditional Firefox/SFX/Upgrade Banners using JavaScript (DOM-compliant)">switch the button</a> if someone&#8217;s using Firefox, and instead promote the Spread Firefox site.  I&#8217;ve written up a <a href="http://my.opera.com/Kelson/blog/show.dml/102838" title="Conditional Opera Banners Using JavaScript">similar method</a> for Opera, though it&#8217;s less clear where to send people.</p>
<p>I recently discovered that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flock_(web_browser)">Flock</a> has taken another approach to solving this problem.  As you may recall, Flock is a browser based on Firefox, focusing on social networking.  It integrates with blogging sites, photo-sharing sites, bookmark-sharing sites and so on.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.flock.com/node/8848">Flockstars Extension expands on this</a> by converting the button into a mini-profile.  You fill in information like an avatar, usernames at Flickr, YouTube, etc., and links to your website(s).  It generates button code that acts like an ordinary Flock button, but contains all this extra information.</p>
<p>The extension reads this information.  Visitors to your site who are using Flock and the extension will see an icon in the toolbar, which will pop up a short profile and a menu of all the facets of your online presence.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a cool idea, and seems to fit perfectly with Flock&#8217;s target audience.  But it only solves half the problem.  The browser promo badge is still there, still taking up space.  The fact that the profile data is in the button code doesn&#8217;t make a difference; it might as well be  stored in a set of META tags in the page head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/04/flockstars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABA Publicity</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/06/aba-publicity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/06/aba-publicity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 05:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Browser Alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/06/25/aba-publicity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a good week for the Alternative Browser Alliance. Last weekend, Opera Watch linked to it in the follow-up to the RSS icon controversy. (I use the site as my URL when posting on browser-related blogs and forums, and &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/06/aba-publicity/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a good week for the <a href="http://www.alternativebrowseralliance.com/">Alternative Browser Alliance</a>.</p>
<p>Last weekend, <a href="http://operawatch.com/">Opera Watch</a> linked to it in the follow-up to the RSS icon controversy.  (I use the site as my URL when posting on browser-related blogs and forums, and Daniel was kind enough to include the link when he highlighted the news I&#8217;d posted in the comments.)</p>
<p>On Tuesday, I linked to it myself in a comment on <a href="http://slashdot.org/">Slashdot</a>.  For once, a couple of hundred people clicked on the link.  Not long afterward, it started popping up on <a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/">StumbleUpon</a> after a dry spell.  (Coincidence?  Well, maybe.)</p>
<p>On Thursday morning, the site got <a href="http://linkfilter.net/?id=114649">posted</a> to <a href="http://linkfilter.net/">Linkfilter</a>, which led to a few dozen visits.</p>
<p>And finally, Thursday night, <a href="http://www.bbspot.com/">BBSpot</a> posted it in their daily links, resulting in over 1500 visits over the past three days!</p>
<p>Thanks to everyone helping to spread the word!</p>
<p>Now I have to start replying to comments&#8230;</p>
<p>In related news, I&#8217;ve finally broken down and added <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flock_(web_browser)">Flock</a> to the <a href="http://www.alternativebrowseralliance.com/browsers.html">list</a>.  Mainly I stayed away from it because I&#8217;d already listed 7 Gecko-based browsers (8 if you count SeaMonkey separately from the Mozilla Suite), and it seemed overkill to add one more.  I first <a href="http://kelson.wordpress.com/2005/10/21/workaround/">tried out Flock</a> back in October, and while it seemed interesting, it didn&#8217;t really grab me.  Now that it&#8217;s in beta, it looks like progress is solid, and it&#8217;s different enough from Firefox or SeaMonkey to warrant inclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/06/aba-publicity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missing Links</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/10/missing-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/10/missing-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 21:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webdesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2005/10/05/missing-links/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slashdot posted a story about a new web browser called Flock. The source was an article at BusinessWeek. Now here&#8217;s the interesting part: It&#8217;s a fairly long article about a web browser, and it mentions a few other web browsers &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/10/missing-links/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slashdot posted a <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/10/05/1817248&#038;tid=185&#038;tid=95">story</a> about a new web browser called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flock_(web_browser)">Flock</a>.  The source was an <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/oct2005/tc2005105_2789_tc024.htm" title="Flock, the New Browser on the Block">article at BusinessWeek</a>.  Now here&#8217;s the interesting part:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a fairly long article about a web browser, and it mentions a few other web browsers including <a href="http://getfirefox.com/">Firefox</a>, <a href="http://my.opera.com/community/download.pl?ref=Kelson&#038;p=opera_desktop">Opera</a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/ie/"><abbr title="Internet Explorer">IE</abbr></a>.  It also mentions websites <a href="http://www.amazon.com/">Amazon.com</a> and <a href="http://del.icio.us/">del.icio.us</a>.  <strong>But the only links in the article are to stock quotes and an earlier article</strong>.</p>
<p>I understand that it&#8217;s <em>Business</em> Week, and I&#8217;m not saying they should have linked to every website that was even tangentially mentioned&#8212;but you&#8217;d think they could have at least linked to the browser company they just profiled!  I had to get that link from Slashdot!  (Unfortunately, so did everyone else, so I won&#8217;t be able to look at the page until tomorrow.)</p>
<p><b>Edit:</b>  Compare the <i>BusinessWeek</i> article to <a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2005/09/68823"  title="Killer Buzz Flocks to New Browser"><i>Wired&#8217;s</i> take</a> from last month.  Even taking into account that they&#8217;re written for different audiences, <i>BusinessWeek</i> still looks like a print article that&#8217;s been thrown up on the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/10/missing-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

