<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>K-Squared Ramblings &#187; Dreamworks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/tag/dreamworks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal</link>
	<description>Sci-fi, comics, humor, photos...it&#039;s all fair game.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ah, Hollywood Accounting!</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/01/ah-hollywood-accounting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/01/ah-hollywood-accounting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 06:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aardman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dreamworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2007/01/31/ah-hollywood-accounting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Los Angeles Times is reporting that Dreamworks and Aardman are going their separate ways after the disappointing performance of Flushed Away and Wallace &#038; Gromit: Curse of the Were-Rabbit. Wait&#8230; Wallace and Gromit? Wasn&#8217;t it #1 on opening weekend? &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/01/ah-hollywood-accounting/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <i>Los Angeles Times</i> is reporting that Dreamworks and Aardman are <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-dreamworks31jan31,1,570419.story">going their separate ways</a> after the disappointing performance of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0424095/"><i>Flushed Away</i></a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0312004/"><i>Wallace &#038; Gromit: Curse of the Were-Rabbit</i></a>.</p>
<p>Wait&#8230; <i>Wallace and Gromit?</i>  Wasn&#8217;t it #1 on opening weekend?  Didn&#8217;t it stay in the top 5 for at least a month?</p>
<blockquote><p>Aardman&#8217;s dry British wit went over well with critics on such films as &#8220;Chicken Run&#8221; in 2000 and 2005&#8242;s &#8220;Wallace &#038; Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit,&#8221; which won an Oscar for best animated feature.</p>
<p>But both &#8220;Wallace &#038; Gromit&#8221; and &#8220;Flushed Away&#8221; were costly misfires, failing to resonate with American audiences. DreamWorks reported a $25-million loss on &#8220;Wallace &#038; Gromit.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmm, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0312004/business">according to IMDB</a>, <i>W&#038;G</i> had an estimated budget of $30 million.  It grossed $16 million its opening weekend and went on to gross $56 million by January, 2006.  Domestically.  That&#8217;s not even counting foreign distribution or DVD sales.</p>
<p>If they spent $30 million and made more than $56 million, <strong>how exactly did they &#8220;lose&#8221; $25 million?</strong>  Where did that missing $50 million go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2007/01/ah-hollywood-accounting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

