<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>K-Squared Ramblings &#187; democrat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/tag/democrat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal</link>
	<description>Sci-fi, comics, humor, photos...it&#039;s all fair game.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comical Third Parties</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/11/comical-third-parties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/11/comical-third-parties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 05:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lex Luthor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2004/11/05/comical-third-parties/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow&#8230; a new issue of Rising Stars! To be honest, it was a bit of a let-down. Usually JMS is better at showing, rather than telling. He&#8217;s infamous for laboriously laying groundwork in the B-plots and character moments of what &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/11/comical-third-parties/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; a new issue of <i>Rising Stars</i>!  To be honest, it was a bit of a let-down.  Usually JMS is better at showing, rather than telling.  He&#8217;s infamous for laboriously laying groundwork in the B-plots and character moments of what seem like &#8220;ordinary&#8221; stand-alone stories, then kicking the arc into high gear and making use of it all.  He did it with <i>Babylon 5</i> and <i>Crusade</i>, with the first arc of <i>Rising Stars</i>, seems to be taking the same approach in <i>Supreme Power</i>, and from what I&#8217;ve heard (though I&#8217;ve seen very little of it) he did the same with <i>Jeremiah</i> as well.  If you&#8217;ve seen <i>B5</i> once the story got going, go back and look at some of the first season episodes, and you&#8217;ll be surprised how early some elements are established.</p>
<p>This issue, however, though it had some nice moments, was basically a plot summary.  &#8220;Poet tells the story of&#8230;&#8221;  It seemed an odd narrative choice, particularly for an issue so near the end of the story (#22 of 24) and for the first issue to hit the shelves in nearly two years.  Maybe it&#8217;ll read better in context.</p>
<p>Anyway, that&#8217;s not what I really wanted to talk about.  What&#8217;s interesting is that in this issue, one of the Specials runs for President.  It reminded me of something about the way comic books tell campaign stories.  When a fictional character is in the race (or the office), he (it usually is a he) is almost always running under one of three circumstances:</p>
<ul>
<li>As an independent.</li>
<li>On a fictional third-party ticket.</li>
<li>On an unidentified party&#8217;s ticket.</li>
</ul>
<p>As we all know, third party candidates are rarely high-profile, and they rarely get significant numbers of votes, and I don&#8217;t think one has <em>ever</em> won the office*.   Yet in comics, it happens all the time.  Of course,  heat vision, teleporters, and people who wear purple tights to fight crime are also commonplace. <span id="more-604"></span></p>
<p>When you think about it, the reason is obvious: the publishers do not want to be accused of political bias, nor do they want to alienate half their readers (or half their readers&#8217; parents).  So you get Ravenshadow running as an independent in <i>Rising Stars</i>, or <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20041012044132/http://www.dccomics.com/features/lex/lexwins.html">Lex Luthor&#8217;s &#8220;Tomorrow Party&#8221;</a> [archive.org] in 2000, or the disguised <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/flash/top.html">Top&#8217;s</a> Vice-Presidential bid as an unidentified third-party candidate in 1996.</p>
<p>There is another approach.  One of 1991&#8242;s <i>Armageddon 2001</i> stories featured Superman running for President.  It&#8217;s told in the context of the two-party system: he goes through the primaries, runs against one opponent, etc.  But they never actually say which party he&#8217;s running with, so you&#8217;re free to make assumptions based on your own political leanings.</p>
<p>On the other hand, when all the story needs is the participation of the current President, most comics will use the <em>real</em> President.  This, of course, makes for some of the more dramatic examples of the ever-shifting timeline of shared-universe comics, like the perrenially-thirtyish Superman shaking hands with JFK.  Perhaps this disconnect is another reason to stick with fictional Presidents.</p>
<p><small>* We have elected presidents from other parties, but not since 1850.  Even then, if I remember correctly &#8212; and feel free to correct me if I don&#8217;t &#8212; there were generally two main parties&#8230; it was just a matter of which two parties were at the top. Here&#8217;s a <a href="http://bensguide.gpo.gov/6-8/government/national/president_list.html">table of past US Presidents</a>.</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/11/comical-third-parties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contrary to popular belief</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/09/contrary-to-popular-belief/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/09/contrary-to-popular-belief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 07:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2004/09/14/contrary-to-popular-belief/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For quite a while now, the always-excellent This Is True newsletter has been advertising writer Randy Cassingham&#8217;s latest (?) project: JumboJoke, a weblog-style daily joke post. I finally took a look at it, and thought I&#8217;d share the following pair &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/09/contrary-to-popular-belief/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For quite a while now, the always-excellent <a href="http://www.thisistrue.com/">This Is True</a> newsletter has been advertising writer Randy Cassingham&#8217;s latest (?) project: <a href="http://www.jumbojoke.com/">JumboJoke</a>, a weblog-style daily joke post.  I finally took a look at it, and thought I&#8217;d share the following pair of lists based on our political parties&#8217; often contradictory platforms and rhetoric:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.jumbojoke.com/what_you_must_believe_to_be_a_good_democrat.html">What You Must Believe to be a Good Democrat</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.jumbojoke.com/what_you_must_believe_to_be_a_good_republican.html">What You Must Believe to be a Good Republican</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/09/contrary-to-popular-belief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

