<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>K-Squared Ramblings &#187; CGI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/tag/cgi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal</link>
	<description>Sci-fi, comics, humor, photos...it&#039;s all fair game.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Overdone CGI-fests?</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/05/overdone-cgi-fests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/05/overdone-cgi-fests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 05:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CGI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Lucas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/?p=861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Y&#8217;know, something I just can&#8217;t understand is the tendency, in rants about how the Star Wars prequels have not measured up to and/or sullied precious memories of the originals, to make sure there&#8217;s a dig about them being soulless computer-generated &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/05/overdone-cgi-fests/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;know, something I just can&#8217;t understand is the tendency, in <a href="http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1501505/05092005/story.jhtml">rants</a> about how the <strong><i>Star Wars</i></strong> prequels have not measured up to and/or sullied precious memories of the originals, to make sure there&#8217;s a dig about them being soulless computer-generated films, often citing the superiority of earlier effects with actual models and the presence of real actors.</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t Pixar and DreamWorks demonstrated that it&#8217;s entirely possible to make a well-constructed, entertaining film entirely with CGI?  Hasn&#8217;t Hollywood&#8217;s studio machine demonstrated that it&#8217;s entirely possible to make a shallow, soulless film entirely with real actors?  Remember the original reviews of <i>Jurassic Park</i> that accused the milestone CGI dinosaurs of being more lifelike than the actors?</p>
<p><strong>It ain&#8217;t the CGI, folks.</strong></p>
<p>The effects are top-notch.  The visual design, even when referencing other films, is impressive.  <strong>Acting.  Directing.  Writing.</strong> <em>This</em> is where Episodes I and II have broken down.  And if you&#8217;ve seen the right movies, you know the leads can act&#8212;when they&#8217;re given a chance.</p>
<p>No, it&#8217;s the dialog and the directing&#8212;both primarily Lucas&#8217; work, and both tasks he let others take on or at least polish in earlier films.  From what I hear <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/arts/story/2005/04/13/hayden050413.html">Tom Stoppard has polished the dialog</a> in Episode III.  One can only hope that Lucas&#8217; &#8220;practice&#8221; directing the last two has given him the experience needed to make the final film stand out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2005/05/overdone-cgi-fests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

