I’ve been using Opera off and on for about 10 years. I think it was 1999 when a classmate showed me Opera 3.6, and how fast and small it was. (This was back when the installer fit on a floppy disk — and back when that actually made a difference.) I’ve followed it as they expanded from Windows onto Mac and Linux, onto high-end cell phones with Opera Mobile, and finally onto every Java-capable phone with Opera Mini. I’ve watched as they went from trialware to ad-supported to freeware business models. And while the desktop browser is no longer the speed demon it used to be, it’s been a consistent innovator in terms of both browser features and web capabilities.

So I’d just like to say: Happy 15th birthday, Opera! Just think, in a year, you’ll be old enough to drive!*

*In California, anyway. I think in Norway the driving age is 18.

IE6 is now two versions behind the current release.

IE6 is almost 8 years old (it was released in 2001).

IE6 is lacking in many capabilities that all other modern web browsers have, in web technology, in security, and in features you can use.

You can read a review at Wired, a write-up from the IE team, or a summary of technical changes from WaSP.

Of course, Internet Explorer isn’t the only option out there. There’s Firefox, Opera, Chrome and a host of other alternative browsers that are worth checking out.

If you’re still running Windows 2000 or some other old version of Windows that can’t run IE7 or IE8, I’d absolutely recommend Firefox or Opera. Either will be much better than IE6, both will run on Windows 2000, and Opera will even run on Windows Me and Windows 98 (but you really ought to move to something more current than Windows Me.)

Hmm, it looks like the G1 just turns compression off when on cell networks for proxying. The network itself may do compression (in theory). #

Browse Happy — the classic.

• Goal: Move users away from Internet Explorer.
• Target Audience: IE users.
• Promotes: Firefox.  Also Safari, Opera, and… um… Mozilla.  Hmm, someone needs to update that.
• Pitch: IE is dangerous.
• Method: Banners

Alternative Browser Alliance

• Goal: Keep multiple standards-compliant browsers viable.
• Target Audience: All users
• Promotes: Opera, Firefox, Safari.  Also Flock, SeaMonkey, K-Meleon, Camino,etc.
• Pitch: Competition is good for everyone.  See what’s out there.
• Method: Banners

End 6!

• Goal: Move people off of IE6
• Target Audience: IE6 users
• Promotes: Firefox, Opera, Safari, Flock, IE7
• Pitch: IE6 is outdated, buggy, and unsafe.  Use something modern instead.
• Method: Overlay for IE6 visitors

Save the Developers

• Goal: Move people off of IE6
• Target Audience: IE6 users
• Promotes: IE7, Firefox, Safari, Opera
• Pitch: Coding for IE6 is a pain.  Stop putting us through that.
• Method: Animated drop-down at top of page for IE6 visitors

(Yeah, I’m catching up on old draft posts.)

Of course, things have changed a lot since 2005, so I’m planning an overhaul of the whole site.

Definite plans include:

• Reflect the current state of web browser marketshare & technologies.
• List new tools, such as Dragonfly and Firebug.
• Update the list of browsers. (Add Chrome, figure out whether anyone uses Galeon anymore, etc.)
• More button/banner sizes.
• Release the whole thing under a Creative Commons license so that it’s easier for people to do translations.

I’m considering adding a blog for browser-related commentary. This would have to be low-frequency, comparable to something like css3.info, or I would have to bring other people in, because I just won’t have time to keep it updated regularly. On the downside, it adds a layer of software complexity. Also, I’m not sure it would add anything to all the blogs out there that currently focus on browser news.

I’d appreciate any suggestions from the general web user, developer, and browser fan communities.

Thanks in advance!

I’d like to see something like this picked up by Firefox and Opera as well. They both have crash recovery already, but it still means restoring the entire session. If you have 20 tabs open, it’s great that you don’t have to hunt them down again. But it also means you have to wait for 20 pages to load simultaneously. It would be much nicer to only have to wait for one (or, if I read the IE8 article correctly, three).

Edited to add:

On a related note, I’ve run into an interesting conflict between crash recovery and WordPress’ auto-save feature. If you start a new post, WordPress will automatically save it as a draft. If the browser crashes, it will bring up the new-post page, but restore most of the form data you filled in. So the title, the text of your post, etc will all be there. But WordPress will see it as a new post, and you’ll end up with a duplicate.

This wasn’t a major problem when I encountered it — I had to reset the categories, tags, and post slug after I hit publish (since I hadn’t noticed that they’d been reset to defaults), and I just deleted the older, partial version of the post — but I can imagine if I’d uploaded an image gallery, I would have been rather annoyed, since there’s no way (that I’ve noticed) to move images from one post to another. Reuse them, sure, but not such that the gallery feature would work.

Opera: A new Opera 9.5 preview came out today, showcasing the browser’s new look. Also, the Opera Core team takes a look at what you can do if you put hardware acceleration on the whole browser.

Internet Explorer: IE8 beta 2 is scheduled for August. I’m looking forward to seeing what they’ve done, and figure I’ll start updating sites to accommodate changes. I held off changing too much when IE8b1 came out, because some of the differences were obviously bugs (triggering the Caio Hack, for instance; and yes, I reported it).

Flock has been moving ahead with small, rapid releases, adding integration for new services each time. They just added Digg and Pownce in Flock 1.2 a few days ago. Now they’re getting ready to start on Flock 2.0, which will merge in all the new capabilities of Firefox 3. That means it’ll get new rendering capabilities, better memory management, probably EV certs and such.

It grew out of my rant on blocking IE6, which pulled in aspects of PayPal’s comments about blocking “unsafe” browsers. I had it mostly finished a month ago, but someone asked to review it before I posted it live, and he promptly got swamped by work on Opera Dragonfly. I finally got the go-ahead about 2 weeks ago, but I was caught up in packing, and then moving, and then unpacking.

Things are finally settling towards a semblance of normality, and with the recent change in how Opera treats EV certificates, I figured it was time to post the article before it became completely out of date.

Opera 9.5 beta
Speed, security, and performance matter.

Now, we’ve made the fastest browser in the world even faster. Opera’s new beta is quicker to start, faster at loading Web pages and better at running your favorite Web applications.

Hmm, a red and yellow blur, zooming across the view? And an emphasis on speed? That reminds me a bit of this guy:

Opera has long promoted itself on its speed, and it has used a super-hero theme in its advertising before. The vaguely Superman-like* “Opera Man” was used heavily in advertising Opera 8, despite being ridiculed by most of the browser’s user community.

So why not a subtle reference to the Flash?

*Blue costume + red cape. Hey, if a blue shirt and red jacket work for Clark on Smallville, you know the color scheme has become iconic.

Well, yeah. That’s our job.

And a bunch of random websites blocking IE6 aren’t going to convince people to change. If I were to block IE6, or only allow Firefox, or only allow Opera, I’d have to have seriously compelling content to get people to switch. Mostly, people would get annoyed and move on. Who’s going to install a new browser just so they can read the history of the Flash? Or choose an ISP? Or buy a product that they can get from another site?

Slapping the User in the Face

It’s so easy for someone to walk away from your site. One of the tenets of good web design is to make the user jump through as few hoops as possible to accomplish whatever you want him/her to do. Every hoop you add is an obstacle. Too many obstacles, and they’ll just go somewhere else more convenient.

Back when I was following Spread Firefox, every once in a while someone would suggest blocking IE. Every time, people like me would shoot it down. And think about it: what does the average Firefox user (or Opera user, for that matter) do when confronted with a site that will only run in IE? Fire off a complaint, or move on, unless it’s something they can’t live without, like, say, their bank. Only then will they bring up the site’s preferred browser…just long enough to do their business and move on.

Plus it goes against the grain of the concept that a website should be viewable in any browser. It offends my sense of… I don’t know, egalitarianism.

Recommend vs. Demand

My current tactics: I target the latest versions of each browser (or rather, the overlap in their standards support), toss in enhancements where I think something would be nice, but not critical (off-site link icons using generated content, for instance, which works in everything except IE≤7, or rounded corners, which only work in Gecko and WebKit so far). And I take that, and make it look reasonably good in IE6. I don’t try to make it perfect anymore (case in point, the header of this blog), but I try to make sure it’s functional and doesn’t look broken.

Then I include a polite notice recommending that people upgrade to something a little more capable or modern for a better experience, but I don’t require them to do so. I don’t pop up anything that moves, or blocks content, or forces them to click through an extra page.

Enter: PayPal

Now, remember what I said about banks? PayPal intends to block “unsafe” browsers from accessing their site (via Slashdot). They aren’t technically a bank, but PayPal is actually in a position where they might be able to do it: they’re the most well known online payment service where two random people can send each other money. Probably more people will switch browsers and keep PayPal than switch payment services and keep their browser.

They’ve since indicated that they don’t intend to block “current versions of any browsers,” but will focus on “obsolete browsers on outdated or unsupported operating systems.” So you IE4 users on Windows 98? Upgrade already! (And since you can’t install IE7, try Opera. It still runs on Win98!)

They’ve also cited such safety features as phishing protection (present in IE7, Firefox 2, and Opera 9) and support for Extended Validation SSL Certificates (present in IE7 and the upcoming Firefox 3 and Opera 9.5).

Hazards of Browser Sniffing

Of course, once you start actively blocking browsers, you have three choices:

• Keep track of every single browser out there, and every version.
• Let most browsers in, but only block a few problem browsers (similar to Yahoo’s Graded Browser Support)
• Unfairly block browsers that might be perfectly adequate just because you can’t be bothered to investigate them.

The last seems the most prevalent. Just ask any Opera user today, or any Firefox user of 3 years ago. (I remember using Firefox and being told to “upgrade” to Netscape 6, even though NS6 was based on an older version of the same engine. Remember: Gecko is Gecko.)

Whitelist approaches to browser detection are, by their nature, either going to require constant updating or block too much. In this case, issues would include:

• Less well-known browsers, like Flock, which uses the same anti-phishing features as Firefox
• Browsers that don’t do phishing detection themselves, using third-party plugins to do the job.
• Changes in status, when browsers add the capabilities required to get on the list.

Thankfully, it looks like PayPal is going with the most minimally-intrusive approach: blocking only the most troublesome browsers, and letting the rest connect normally.

Will it Work?

There’s still the question of whether it’ll actually make users less likely to land on a PayPal phishing site.

For one thing, it’s not clear whether they’ll block IE6. The initial report would definitely have excluded it, since it lacks both EV support and anti-phishing (without an add-on). But the follow-up statement was focused on Safari. Does PayPal consider IE6 to be a “current” version since Microsoft still supports it? Or do they consider IE7 to be current, and IE6 to be obsolete?

Certainly, if they don’t block IE6, this will really only impact the tiny fraction of users running horribly outdated software. (Well, more horribly outdated.)

The thing to remember is that the features PayPal is promoting will only help if users switch for general browsing. In fact, anti-phishing will make no difference at all on PayPal’s actual site, unless it gets hacked (at which point the user is screwed anyway.)

So let’s suppose that they do block IE6. As much as I’d like people to switch to Firefox or Opera full-time, I’m sure there will be some people who only fire up an alternative to use PayPal, and who stick with IE6 the rest of the time. They’re just as likely as before to click on a bogus “Pay with PayPal” button, or a link in a phishing email. If they weren’t going to do that in the first place, the browser requirement wasn’t needed. If they were, the browser requirement doesn’t help. The bogus sites won’t require phishing detection, or EV certs. Imagine the user saying, “Hey, PayPal fixed the problem where it wouldn’t let me use IE!”

And of course it won’t stop someone with a stolen login and password from connecting using an “approved” browser.

The ISC has also weighed in re: limitations of EV certificates. Among other things: it may be easier to get an EV cert than suggested, in which case it won’t indicate any greater degree of trust than a standard SSL certificate. And it doesn’t prevent other issues, like keyword loggers or trojans that simply hijack a user’s session.

I apologize for the rambling nature of this post (yeah, site title and all that). But I worked on it on a succession of late nights, and decided it was time to just post the thing. Also, I should have a somewhat more concise post up on OperaWatch soon now.

Thanks, Daniel, for the opportunity to be part of Opera Watch!

Now I need to think of something to write!

The key issue, of course, is moving as many users as possible from a discontinued browser—there’s no doubt that security holes will be found in it over time—to one that is actively maintained.

Why Flock, specifically? Well, sticking with the same toolkit and user profile makes migration easier, so that narrows the field to Firefox and Flock. (Not sure about SeaMonkey’s profile.) Since Netscape 8 and 9 were big on integrating with websites, Flock’s “social browser” seems a slightly better fit. And it turns out most of the Netscape 8 team went on to build Flock. Talk about social networking!

(via Flock: The Netscape Spirit Lives On)

Really, the only things holding me back from jumping up to Firefox 3 on my main computers at home and at work were Firebug and some of the HTML validator extensions. Firebug is complicated enough that I didn’t want to rely on the Nightly Tester Tools to disable the compatibility checks. Then I found out that there’s a Firebug beta that does work with Firefox 3. That was enough. Last night I took the plunge.

Meanwhile, things look good on the ditch-IE6 front. After last month’s false alarm due to a local maximum, it looks like IE7 has solidly overtaken IE6 on this site! For the first 13½ days of January, Internet Explorer accounted for 62.5% of total hits. IE7 was 33.5%, and IE6 was only 28.4%. Even better, that’s barely over 1 percentage point from Firefox’s 27.2%!

Most likely, a lot of people got new computers for Christmas. New Windows boxes would mostly be Vista, and would ship with IE7. Another factor might be techies visiting their relatives and helping clean up/update their computers. They might have taken the opportunity to install IE7 or Firefox.

Also, Progressive Enhancement with CSS3. This is an approach I’ve been taking for quite a while, particularly with my personal sites, but it’s starting to creep into sites I’m building for work as well. Essentially: Build it to look decent in everything, but throw in enhancements to browsers that you know can handle them.

An example of progressive enhancement: the rounded corners on the tabs on my Flash site. They’re not critical to the design, but it does make it look better in Safari and Firefox. And in theory, Opera and IE will eventually pick up the capability. (Though in this case, since border-radius is still experimental, I’ll have to change the CSS when they do—so maybe it’s not the best example.)

Back in February, I was wandering the aisles at Micro Center and noticed a couple of odd software titles on the shelf:

• Netscape Basics, a jewel-cased CD-ROM which contained Netscape Communicator 4.5 and boasted compatibility with Windows 95 and Windows 98.
• Opera for Windows, a boxed copy of I forget-which-version, but judging by the “New! Voice Enabled!” badge, it’s probably 8.0.

Keep in mind that this was February 2007. So that was an 8-year old Netscape box, and a 2-year-old Opera box. Netscape had been free for 9 years, and Opera had been free for 1½ years.

Someone had sensibly marked the Netscape CD down repeatedly, ending with a price tag of $0.42. I was half-tempted to buy it just to prove that I’d found it, but decided taking a picture would be better, since it wouldn’t clutter up my desk. Incredibly, no one had thought to mark down the Opera box. They were still asking $39.99 for it.

Did I mention pictures?