<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>K-Squared Ramblings &#187; analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/tag/analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal</link>
	<description>Sci-fi, comics, humor, photos...it&#039;s all fair game.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Spam Target Breakdown</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/05/spam-target-breakdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/05/spam-target-breakdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 06:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/05/28/spam-target-breakdown/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems obvious that different email addresses get different types of spam. I recently noticed that even addresses with nearly identical exposure sometimes end up with wildly different collections. A number of our spamtrap addresses are &#8220;seeded&#8221; by hiding them &#8230; <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/05/spam-target-breakdown/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems obvious that different email addresses get different types of spam.  I recently noticed that even addresses with nearly identical exposure sometimes end up with wildly different collections.</p>
<p>A number of our spamtrap addresses are &#8220;seeded&#8221; by <a href="http://spamhuntress.com/2006/05/26/hiding-spamtraps-in-plain-sight/">hiding them on websites</a>.  Put it somewhere that no human visitor will notice, &#8217;cause the harvesting bots will see it anyway.  There&#8217;s a whole set scattered across this domain, for instance, and even the spamtraps hidden in different areas of this site attract different types of spammers.</p>
<p>My <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/flash/" title="Flash: Those Who Ride the Lightning">Flash site</a> is the most high-trafficked section on here.  Spamtraps there seem to pick up mostly ads for dubious pharmaceuticals, and occasionally mortgage offers.  It&#8217;s also the most heavily linked-to section, so this is probably the target of spiders that jump from site to site.</p>
<p>The remnants of my <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/les-mis/" title="Les Mis: The Libretto Has Left the Building">Les Mis&eacute;rables site</a> wouldn&#8217;t seem to be terribly popular with spammers, but it turns out spamtraps on those pages pick up quite a bit&#8230;mostly in Chinese.  Back when the site was active, it got linked to by a lyrics site in Taiwan.  When it went more-or-less offline, the link stayed.</p>
<p>Spamtraps rotated through the top page of the site seem to collect mostly porn.  I&#8217;m guessing there&#8217;s a class of bots that just look for valid domain names and hit the home page&#8230; and they&#8217;re mostly used by porn spammers.</p>
<p>The last area of the site that gets lots of spam is this blog.  And it seems to collect all of the above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2006/05/spam-target-breakdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

