<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nightmare Before Christmas: 3-D Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/11/08/nbc3d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/11/08/nbc3d/</link>
	<description>Sci-fi, comics, humor, photos...it&#039;s all fair game.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:03:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: West</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/11/08/nbc3d/#comment-40061</link>
		<dc:creator>West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/11/08/nbc3d/#comment-40061</guid>
		<description>By the way, I saw it and dug it.  I already loved the original and I love 3D presentations.

I agree with your assessments.  Good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, I saw it and dug it.  I already loved the original and I love 3D presentations.</p>
<p>I agree with your assessments.  Good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelson</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/11/08/nbc3d/#comment-12991</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/11/08/nbc3d/#comment-12991</guid>
		<description>Oh, yeah, the &quot;did I like it&quot; test.  Heh.

I&#039;d say that, overall, being 3D didn&#039;t add much.  Which makes sense, because it wasn&#039;t filmed with 3D in mind, so nothing really took advantage of it.  There were a couple of shots that jumped out, but not many.

It didn&#039;t take anything away, though, which is always a risk when someone redoes a movie.  I can&#039;t think of anything in it that was worse off for the conversion.

If you want to see it just for the 3D effects, don&#039;t bother.  But if you like the movie and want to see it again, or if you&#039;d always wanted to see it but never got around to it, the 3D shouldn&#039;t stop you.  (Unless you can&#039;t stand wearing the glasses, of course!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yeah, the &#8220;did I like it&#8221; test.  Heh.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say that, overall, being 3D didn&#8217;t add much.  Which makes sense, because it wasn&#8217;t filmed with 3D in mind, so nothing really took advantage of it.  There were a couple of shots that jumped out, but not many.</p>
<p>It didn&#8217;t take anything away, though, which is always a risk when someone redoes a movie.  I can&#8217;t think of anything in it that was worse off for the conversion.</p>
<p>If you want to see it just for the 3D effects, don&#8217;t bother.  But if you like the movie and want to see it again, or if you&#8217;d always wanted to see it but never got around to it, the 3D shouldn&#8217;t stop you.  (Unless you can&#8217;t stand wearing the glasses, of course!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: West</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/11/08/nbc3d/#comment-12984</link>
		<dc:creator>West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 21:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2006/11/08/nbc3d/#comment-12984</guid>
		<description>Umm... Was it any good in 3D (from a simple movie-goer&#039;s perspective)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230; Was it any good in 3D (from a simple movie-goer&#8217;s perspective)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
