<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interesting omission</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/04/interesting-omission/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/04/interesting-omission/</link>
	<description>Sci-fi, comics, humor, photos...it&#039;s all fair game.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:01:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/04/interesting-omission/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 21:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2004/04/12/interesting-omission/#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Grumble. As a Safari user, I&#039;ve noticed the assumption is that in an emergency you can switch to IE. As though Linux users and Mac OS 10.3 users would naturally have a Win Box too. 

Do you think CNET is playing to Microsoft&#039;s interests by the browser omission or it is just operating under the same Microsoft dominated mindset?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grumble. As a Safari user, I&#8217;ve noticed the assumption is that in an emergency you can switch to IE. As though Linux users and Mac OS 10.3 users would naturally have a Win Box too. </p>
<p>Do you think CNET is playing to Microsoft&#8217;s interests by the browser omission or it is just operating under the same Microsoft dominated mindset?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

