<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Far-Flung Finances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/03/far-flung-finances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/03/far-flung-finances/</link>
	<description>Sci-fi, comics, humor, photos...it&#039;s all fair game.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:01:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hollywood and Space &#124; K-Squared Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2004/03/far-flung-finances/#comment-10195</link>
		<dc:creator>Hollywood and Space &#124; K-Squared Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2004/03/03/far-flung-finances/#comment-10195</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s the &#8220;spacelaunch&#8221; comment that I find most interesting, as I made the same comparison a few years ago, from the other side of the fence: Assuming that the Spirit and Opportunity missions to Mars are typical, price-wise, it doesn&#8217;t make sense to complain that we&#8217;re &#8220;wasting&#8221; money on space exploration when a mission costs as much as two summer blockbusters. Manned missions are, of course, more expensive, but robotic missions? If we, as a society, toss away $250 million several times a year on mindless action flicks, what&#8217;s so terrible about spending a similar amount to learn something about our universe? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s the &#8220;spacelaunch&#8221; comment that I find most interesting, as I made the same comparison a few years ago, from the other side of the fence: Assuming that the Spirit and Opportunity missions to Mars are typical, price-wise, it doesn&#8217;t make sense to complain that we&#8217;re &#8220;wasting&#8221; money on space exploration when a mission costs as much as two summer blockbusters. Manned missions are, of course, more expensive, but robotic missions? If we, as a society, toss away $250 million several times a year on mindless action flicks, what&#8217;s so terrible about spending a similar amount to learn something about our universe? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

