<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geographical Knowledge (Vacuum)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2002/11/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2002/11/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/</link>
	<description>Sci-fi, comics, humor, photos...it&#039;s all fair game.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 06:57:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelson</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2002/11/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-12196</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2002/11/21/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-12196</guid>
		<description>Nah, there&#039;s nothing special about the formula.  It&#039;s just a plot gimmick that the writers of the early Johnny Quick stories came up with. Just like the speed force is a gimmick that Mark Waid came up with to tie together the origins of the various Flashes.

Sorry about the disappearing comments.  You re-posted so many times, so quickly, that the spam filter kicked in and hid them.  Hmm, maybe you&#039;ve got super-speed already! ;-)

(P.S. I removed your email address from the comment that I pulled out of moderation.  As the site owner I can see the one from the form field, but &lt;em&gt;anyone&lt;/em&gt; can see the one you put in the comment itself---including spammers, who have programs that crawl across the web and pick up new addresses for their mailing lists.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, there&#8217;s nothing special about the formula.  It&#8217;s just a plot gimmick that the writers of the early Johnny Quick stories came up with. Just like the speed force is a gimmick that Mark Waid came up with to tie together the origins of the various Flashes.</p>
<p>Sorry about the disappearing comments.  You re-posted so many times, so quickly, that the spam filter kicked in and hid them.  Hmm, maybe you&#8217;ve got super-speed already! <img src='http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(P.S. I removed your email address from the comment that I pulled out of moderation.  As the site owner I can see the one from the form field, but <em>anyone</em> can see the one you put in the comment itself&#8212;including spammers, who have programs that crawl across the web and pick up new addresses for their mailing lists.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CLARENCE EZRA CHEATOM</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2002/11/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-12186</link>
		<dc:creator>CLARENCE EZRA CHEATOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2002/11/21/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-12186</guid>
		<description>is there really such an equation called:3x2(9yz)4a,if so can one truly hope to feel the speed force by using this formula?i would like to know this,also how would i use this in general practice? do i keep recieting it over and over,do  i yell it out loud or silently say it to myself?please send me a reply via e-mail at:[Ed: removed to protect you from spam] thank you so very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there really such an equation called:3&#215;2(9yz)4a,if so can one truly hope to feel the speed force by using this formula?i would like to know this,also how would i use this in general practice? do i keep recieting it over and over,do  i yell it out loud or silently say it to myself?please send me a reply via e-mail at:[Ed: removed to protect you from spam] thank you so very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2002/11/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-7215</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2002/11/21/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-7215</guid>
		<description>Geography encompasses a great deal more than identifying countries or rivers on maps.  The field is broad and includes areas such as obtaining and rectifying satellite imagery, community and transportation planning, and research in many different areas.  Perhaps the problem is not that teachers do not have time or that schools do not have resources, but that the general public views geography as useless knowledge.  In reality, geography crosses into many fields and its disciplines can be valuable in many different occupations.  Then again, as a researcher in transportation geography, I may be a bit biased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geography encompasses a great deal more than identifying countries or rivers on maps.  The field is broad and includes areas such as obtaining and rectifying satellite imagery, community and transportation planning, and research in many different areas.  Perhaps the problem is not that teachers do not have time or that schools do not have resources, but that the general public views geography as useless knowledge.  In reality, geography crosses into many fields and its disciplines can be valuable in many different occupations.  Then again, as a researcher in transportation geography, I may be a bit biased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelson</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2002/11/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2004 23:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2002/11/21/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-423</guid>
		<description>3X2(9YZ)4A&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hyperborea.org/flash/johnny.html&quot;&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;  That should speed you on your way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3X2(9YZ)4A<a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/flash/johnny.html">.</a>  That should speed you on your way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roeung Sophorn</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2002/11/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Roeung Sophorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2004 10:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2002/11/21/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-420</guid>
		<description>I want u to send me some math for hight school. Thank u for hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want u to send me some math for hight school. Thank u for hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2002/11/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Janice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2002/11/21/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-417</guid>
		<description>Surveys over many years (throughout the 80&#039;s and &#039;90s) have shown that American kids have a severe lack of geographic knowledge.

In a recent survey 80% of high schoolers couldn&#039;t name the worlds largest democracy, and 25% couldn&#039;t name the Ocean between the US and Asia.

What makes this all the more concerning today is 1) the world is becoming such a small place, with travel and technology connecting us to people all over the world  2) US companies now operate in nearly all countries of the world, so our children will have jobs that almost certainly will have an international aspect 3) the US is the worlds sole superpower and as such plays global policeman.
With all this in place we very much need to improve the geographic knowledge of our kids. 

We&#039;re doing our little bit by making world maps available at http://www.mapkids.org/world-map-for-kids.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surveys over many years (throughout the 80&#8242;s and &#8217;90s) have shown that American kids have a severe lack of geographic knowledge.</p>
<p>In a recent survey 80% of high schoolers couldn&#8217;t name the worlds largest democracy, and 25% couldn&#8217;t name the Ocean between the US and Asia.</p>
<p>What makes this all the more concerning today is 1) the world is becoming such a small place, with travel and technology connecting us to people all over the world  2) US companies now operate in nearly all countries of the world, so our children will have jobs that almost certainly will have an international aspect 3) the US is the worlds sole superpower and as such plays global policeman.<br />
With all this in place we very much need to improve the geographic knowledge of our kids. </p>
<p>We&#8217;re doing our little bit by making world maps available at <a href="http://www.mapkids.org/world-map-for-kids.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mapkids.org/world-map-for-kids.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kizi</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2002/11/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Kizi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2002/11/21/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-409</guid>
		<description>Really? I thought the unimportance of Geography was because the American government just treats the rest of the world as it&#039;s toilet. 

PS: English teachers get paid far, far worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? I thought the unimportance of Geography was because the American government just treats the rest of the world as it&#8217;s toilet. </p>
<p>PS: English teachers get paid far, far worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2002/11/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2002/11/21/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>How badly are teachers underpaid?  I live in a fairly affluent part of Pennsylvania, and I&#039;ve heard that the average teacher&#039;s salary in this state is somewhere around $55K annually.  That&#039;s not fabulous, but it&#039;s certainly well above the poverty level.

I fully support paying teachers more, as they have one of the most important jobs in our society.  If doubling my property taxes meant we could double teacher salaries, I&#039;d happily pay it.  I think that if we can make the position so desirable that people have to compete to get it, instead of having school districts beg and plead for teachers, then we&#039;d see some quality teaching.  However, I would like to make sure we have the facts straight -- can anyone confirm that average teacher salaries really are &quot;insulting&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How badly are teachers underpaid?  I live in a fairly affluent part of Pennsylvania, and I&#8217;ve heard that the average teacher&#8217;s salary in this state is somewhere around $55K annually.  That&#8217;s not fabulous, but it&#8217;s certainly well above the poverty level.</p>
<p>I fully support paying teachers more, as they have one of the most important jobs in our society.  If doubling my property taxes meant we could double teacher salaries, I&#8217;d happily pay it.  I think that if we can make the position so desirable that people have to compete to get it, instead of having school districts beg and plead for teachers, then we&#8217;d see some quality teaching.  However, I would like to make sure we have the facts straight &#8212; can anyone confirm that average teacher salaries really are &#8220;insulting&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2002/11/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2002 05:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2002/11/21/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>The standardized testing movement can be traced back to 1957, when the Soviets launched Sputnik and a bunch of conservative politicians exploited public concern--blaming our schools for not producing scientists sufficiently well educated to get us into space first--in order to push forward policies reflecting their educational agenda, which only undermined the quality of public school education.

Long story short: extremely effective right wing propaganda since then has eroded the general public&#039;s confidence in public education (although it&#039;s interesting to note that national Gallup polls have consistently shown for years that while most people think the state of public education in America is abysmal as a whole, most people also think quite highly of the particular public schools their children attend).

Those who advocate standardized tests mean well.  The tests are intended to monitor the quality of education and hold teachers and students accountable for their academic performance.  High stakes (such as college admissions, school funding, high school graduation, etc.) are attached to test scores as incentive.  The problem is that the tests are inadequate measures of achievement.  It&#039;s an excellent idea to hold teachers and students accountable for their performance, but these tests hold them accountable for the wrong things.  This is not the work of teachers but of naive politicians who understand neither pedagogy nor principles of scientific measurement.

As to the collective intelligence of public school teachers. . . .  Look at it this way:  Confidence in public schools erodes.  Teachers take the heat.  The job&#039;s a strain to begin with, and for many, this is too much.  The pay is insulting, while the job is exhausting and generally thankless.  Many who stay in the profession become worn out and less effective.  Many more leave.  Turnover is significant.  Less than 50% of new teachers remain teachers more than a few years.  As a result, the vast majority of our teachers are either novices or burned out veterans who&#039;ve held on longer than they should.  A lot of the novices have potential, and many are actually fairly good, but given the statistics, it&#039;s hard to find mentors, and these guys aren&#039;t likely to stick around long enough to gain the experience they need to become exceptionally good on their own.  Distrust of teachers becomes self-fulfilling prophecy.

Meanwhile, bad press for teachers gives children a measure of license to slack off and behave disruptively in class, making the job that much harder, and when the children&#039;s grades suffer as a result, the teachers take the blame.

It all comes back to blaming teachers by default.  The more we do it, the worse things get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The standardized testing movement can be traced back to 1957, when the Soviets launched Sputnik and a bunch of conservative politicians exploited public concern&#8211;blaming our schools for not producing scientists sufficiently well educated to get us into space first&#8211;in order to push forward policies reflecting their educational agenda, which only undermined the quality of public school education.</p>
<p>Long story short: extremely effective right wing propaganda since then has eroded the general public&#8217;s confidence in public education (although it&#8217;s interesting to note that national Gallup polls have consistently shown for years that while most people think the state of public education in America is abysmal as a whole, most people also think quite highly of the particular public schools their children attend).</p>
<p>Those who advocate standardized tests mean well.  The tests are intended to monitor the quality of education and hold teachers and students accountable for their academic performance.  High stakes (such as college admissions, school funding, high school graduation, etc.) are attached to test scores as incentive.  The problem is that the tests are inadequate measures of achievement.  It&#8217;s an excellent idea to hold teachers and students accountable for their performance, but these tests hold them accountable for the wrong things.  This is not the work of teachers but of naive politicians who understand neither pedagogy nor principles of scientific measurement.</p>
<p>As to the collective intelligence of public school teachers. . . .  Look at it this way:  Confidence in public schools erodes.  Teachers take the heat.  The job&#8217;s a strain to begin with, and for many, this is too much.  The pay is insulting, while the job is exhausting and generally thankless.  Many who stay in the profession become worn out and less effective.  Many more leave.  Turnover is significant.  Less than 50% of new teachers remain teachers more than a few years.  As a result, the vast majority of our teachers are either novices or burned out veterans who&#8217;ve held on longer than they should.  A lot of the novices have potential, and many are actually fairly good, but given the statistics, it&#8217;s hard to find mentors, and these guys aren&#8217;t likely to stick around long enough to gain the experience they need to become exceptionally good on their own.  Distrust of teachers becomes self-fulfilling prophecy.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, bad press for teachers gives children a measure of license to slack off and behave disruptively in class, making the job that much harder, and when the children&#8217;s grades suffer as a result, the teachers take the blame.</p>
<p>It all comes back to blaming teachers by default.  The more we do it, the worse things get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regan</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/2002/11/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Regan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2002 21:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2002/11/21/geographical-knowledge-vacuum/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>It was noted in the local paper (SD Union-Tribune) that public schools (and teachers) have been encouraged to focus on basic math and literacy skills in preparation for standardized tests, and that the emphasis on standardized tests dissuades most teachers from using history, geography, and science as means of instruction in either of the favored subjects.  That, and the fact that, for the most part, most teachers are not the best and brightest of the universities and colleges anyhow (though there are still a fair number amongst teachers who could be counted as such).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was noted in the local paper (SD Union-Tribune) that public schools (and teachers) have been encouraged to focus on basic math and literacy skills in preparation for standardized tests, and that the emphasis on standardized tests dissuades most teachers from using history, geography, and science as means of instruction in either of the favored subjects.  That, and the fact that, for the most part, most teachers are not the best and brightest of the universities and colleges anyhow (though there are still a fair number amongst teachers who could be counted as such).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

